Thousand-fold myth, reverse bets, smart money movements: a breakdown of three major options trades!
Thousand-fold Myth, Reverse Bets, Smart Money Movements: Detailed Breakdown of Three Recent Large Options Trades!
Dear fellow investor! We have noticed that many investors encounter significant challenges when investing in stocks and feel uncertain about transitioning to options. To assist novice options traders in developing their mindset, enhancing their understanding, and seizing opportunities through practical experience, we have established the 'Beginner's Guide to Options Trading.' Our aim is to accompany you on a path toward continuous improvement. If this interests you, you are welcome to join.Click hereSubscribe to the learning program, and you will receive notifications when new updates are available in subsequent columns.
*The following content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. Data as of the U.S. stock market open on February 26, 2026.
The options market never lacks stories. But while it's easy to enjoy the spectacle, understanding the intricacies is much harder. When you see news about "a thousand-fold surge in a stock’s near-expiry options" or notice unusual trading volumes on an options leaderboard, you might find it difficult to interpret what it means.
Today, we will use three real-life cases from different types to cut through the surface noise and understand the underlying logic. We’ll also consider how, as beginners, we can apply this thinking to our own trades.
Case One: Netflix — A Contrarian Bet on 'Failed Takeover' Becoming a Positive Catalyst
Recently$Netflix(NFLX.US)$ One particularly imaginative and large-scale strategic trade saw a mysterious trader establish a position worth nearly $14 million.
1. What exactly was the strategy? The trader purchased 55,000 Netflix May-expiry call options with a strike price of $90, while simultaneously selling the same number of May-expiry call options at a strike price of $105, forming a Bull Call Spread (a bullish vertical spread strategy). The cost per contract was approximately $2.51, totaling an outlay of $13.8 million in option premiums, corresponding to 5.5 million shares of Netflix.
2. What view was he expressing? This move indicates that he believes Netflix’s share price will rise, but not excessively. Specifically, there are three points to consider:
By purchasing $90 strike price calls, he indicated his belief that Netflix’s stock would rise from its then-current level of around $83.
Selling $105 strike price calls reflects a deliberate decision to forgo profits above that price. He doesn’t believe (or need) the stock to soar indefinitely; a moderate increase within the $90-$105 range suffices.
He used the income from selling the higher-strike calls to offset the cost of buying the lower-strike ones. Purchasing 55,000 $90 calls alone would have been more expensive. However, by selling the $105 calls, he recouped some of the premium, significantly reducing the net cost per contract.
The profit and loss characteristics of this operation upon expiration can be referenced in the figure below. The image is for educational investment purposes only and does not represent any investment advice.
The breakeven point occurs approximately when the stock price is around $92.51 (where $2.51 represents the contract unit price, and the figure shows $92.9 due to differences in strategy costs at the time of the screenshot versus when the order was placed).
The maximum loss corresponds to the net premium expenditure of the combination, which amounts to $13.8 million for him, or $251 per single-contract combination, while in the figure below, it is $290 per single-contract combination.
The maximum profit occurs when the stock price reaches $105. Excluding transaction fees, the theoretical profit could reach ($105 - $90) * 5.5 million - $13.8 million = $68.7 million.

3. What market context and judgment underpin his perspective?
The market's focus at the time was that Netflix had reached an acquisition agreement with Warner Bros. at $27.75 per share, but Paramount Global (PSKY.US) unexpectedly entered the fray with a higher bid of $31 per share, posing a direct competitive threat.
According to the agreement, should Netflix fail in its acquisition attempt, it would receive a breakup fee of $2.8 billion. This sum not only compensates for opportunity costs but also ensures financial discipline amid an environment of high capital costs.
This trader’s judgment might be that the acquisition will fail and that this outcome would constitute a positive development.
A successful acquisition could entail risks such as massive cash outflows, integration challenges, management distraction, and potential market skepticism, whereas a failed acquisition would mean preserving cash, eliminating uncertainties, securing a $2.8 billion breakup fee, and refocusing on core operations.
Reports suggest that Netflix's CEO plans to visit the White House for discussions. Market speculation indicates that political pressure might provide Netflix with a graceful exit from the bidding process — terminating the deal by citing regulatory or policy risks, which would prompt the market to swiftly remove any risk discount.
The May expiry of the options leaves a specific time window for potential decision-making regarding the bidding. In other words, he is not betting on an immediate rise tomorrow but rather wagering on the outcome of a specific event, giving himself sufficient time for it to unfold.
4. What lessons does this hold for options beginners?
This trade clearly expresses a distinct viewpoint: "Netflix is highly likely to rise to the $90–$105 range within the next three months due to the value unlocked by a failed acquisition," as opposed to a vague idea that "Netflix will go up." In other words, compared to stocks, options allow you to articulate your market judgment more precisely at a lower cost.
The Bull Call Spread strategy limits losses, with the maximum loss determined at the moment of opening the position—essentially the net premium paid. This is equivalent to setting a stop-loss line from the outset. It reminds us that risk control can be embedded in the structure of the strategy itself, rather than relying solely on willpower, which is often unreliable for beginners.
Returning to this strategy, if you are just starting to learn options, the Bull Call Spread may serve as a beginner-friendly starting point with manageable risks, clear logic, and frequent practical application.
Moreover, while many are discussing "what will happen if the acquisition succeeds," this trader has already begun positioning for "what will happen if the acquisition fails." Such contrarian thinking is crucial in options trading, and you can also train yourself to think inversely. Since options pricing reflects market consensus, excess returns often stem from possibilities outside that consensus.
Case Study Two: Amazon — The Truth Behind the 1,199x Surge, the Myth of End-of-Life Options
As $Amazon(AMZN.US)$ the addition of Monday and Wednesday expiry options contracts for nine core underlying assets has made short-term speculation unprecedentedly active, with small funds placing low-cost bets on short-term volatility becoming even more prominent.

1. What are some noteworthy options underliers?
Based on the criteria of 'nine key targets, option latest price between $0.1 to $1 (implying a single option contract price of $10 to $100), and expiration within three days,' the most notable option that met these standards yesterday was Amazon's call option with a strike price of $260, expiring on February 25, 2026, which delivered a 'thousand-fold return.'

What is the logic behind this?
This is akin to a doomsday gamble. The buyer bets on a sharp and directional movement in the stock price over an extremely short period. Due to the low cost of the option premium, if the bet pays off, the leverage effect can be amplified to an astonishing degree, delivering returns in the hundreds or even thousands of times. This exemplifies the extraordinary power of options at their peak.
Why does such a leverage effect exist? It has to do with the substantial disparity between the 'premium' and the 'notional value' in option pricing.
When a call option with only a few days left until expiration is deep out-of-the-money (with a strike price significantly higher than the current stock price), its premium becomes extremely cheap. However, the notional value of the stock underlying this contract could be tens or even hundreds of times the premium.
If the underlying stock experiences a sharp move exceeding market expectations before expiration, turning this nearly worthless contract into an in-the-money position (where the strike price is lower than the current stock price), its intrinsic value will rapidly surge from zero to a level corresponding with the degree of moneyness.
Due to the initially low cost, the absolute growth in value, magnified by leverage, translates into returns several hundred or even thousand times over.
*Note: The intrinsic value of an option can be understood as the value obtained if exercised immediately, and it is always greater than or equal to zero. The intrinsic value of a Call is the market price of the stock minus the strike price, while the intrinsic value of a Put is the strike price minus the market price of the stock. In addition to intrinsic value, options also have a time value component, which decays as time passes and is related to the implied volatility (IV), an indicator that reflects expectations about future price fluctuations of the underlying asset.
However, it is important to note that behind this remarkable leverage lies a highly asymmetric risk structure.
The buyer is essentially using a minimal cost to purchase an event with a statistically low probability of occurring (usually less than 5%). Data shows that the probability of exercising this option is only about 1.23%—in other words, this is a bet with just over a 1% chance of success.

In the vast majority of cases, this premium will expire worthless, resulting in a total loss for the buyer. Thus, this type of trade is essentially a wager on a 'low-probability, high-payout' event, where the leverage effect stems from a structure that allows small investments to yield large returns, as well as precise bets on extreme market volatility.
3. What implications does this have for options beginners?
The market often glorifies those contracts with explosive gains but seldom mentions that thousands of similar options expire worthless at the same time. Its educational value far outweighs its wealth-building potential—it vividly teaches you what option leverage is and what zeroing-out risk entails. Additionally, purchasing options close to expiration not only accelerates capital turnover but also speeds up the decay of time value.
If you are attracted to this, strictly adhere to the principle of 'small capital trial and error.' Treat it as a ticket to experience market volatility using an amount you can afford to lose entirely (e.g., 1% of your total capital), and never go all in.
Finally, if you wish to learn more about practical options through similar cases, you canClick here, follow Futu's Options Activity Highlights, which updates the 'Hundred Dollars Playing Options' column daily.
Case Study Three: Coinbase —— What signals lie behind the large put options order
Recently, $Coinbase(COIN.US)$ 's options market saw a noteworthy large trade:
Someone sold approximately 46,200 put options contracts for COIN with a strike price of $190 and an expiration date of February 27, 2026 (expiring soon) yesterday (February 25). Notably, the volume of 46,200 contracts far exceeds the open interest of 216 contracts for this option, resulting in a V/OI (Volume / Open Interest) ratio of approximately 214.

When the V/OI ratio is exceptionally high (typically screened at ≥10), it indicates that a trader is establishing a new, large position rather than adjusting an existing one. This serves as an important 'smart money' signal.
However, it is important not to overlook that the order type for this transaction is a cross trade. This refers to a trade executed within the same brokerage firm (or broker), simultaneously matching both the buyer and seller. The buying broker and selling broker belong to the same individual or company, and after reaching an agreement on price, the trade is pushed to the market and completed.
1. What are the possible implications behind this large order?
It could be an internal position adjustment by an institution; it might also be a trade agreed upon privately off-market between two institutions;
It could be a market maker performing rebalancing (market makers passively accumulate large option positions in their daily operations — whatever clients buy, market makers must sell; whatever clients sell, market makers must take; when inventory deviates from the target, the market maker needs to rebalance);
It could also be structured products linked to COIN triggering maturity conditions at this point in time, prompting the issuing institution to handle the underlying hedging positions of the product…
Of course, it is not entirely impossible that even in the case of a cross trade, there may still be genuine directional views behind it. In such a scenario: the Put seller expresses the view that 'COIN’s stock price will be above $190 at expiration.' However, even with directional intent, the signal strength of a cross trade is much lower than active sweeping orders in the open market.
2. What insights does this offer to options beginners?
First, you canClick here, follow the 'Daily Options Tracker' column to discover some market signals from daily options movements.
You can pay attention to the V/OI metric to observe the direction of 'smart money.' However, when you notice unusually large orders or abnormal V/OI values, make sure to verify the order type. You can check via the path: Individual Stock Details > Options > Options Movements. If the trade type is a cross trade, the directional significance it conveys may be significantly reduced.
This actually also tells us that there is a lot of noise in the daily trading data of the options market, and one must learn to distinguish the noise from truly valuable trading signals. It also illustrates that in the options market, the information you see may only be the tip of the iceberg. Do not make trading decisions based solely on a single piece of information; instead, integrate various factors such as the fundamentals and technical aspects of individual stocks, along with more options data, to form a comprehensive judgment.
Conclusion
Three cases, three perspectives, respectively showcase three facets of the options world:
The Netflix trade teaches us that options can help you express a precise viewpoint while locking in risk at the moment of opening a position; Amazon's thousand-fold myth reminds us that behind astonishing leverage lies an extremely low probability of success, making respect for the market more important than chasing excessive profits; Coinbase's cross-market trades show us that not all market information constitutes actionable signals—learning to discern noise and understanding the structure behind trades is an essential lesson in options trading.
For beginners, rather than rushing to place orders or chase every seemingly lucrative opportunity, it is better to focus on mastering these three practices: expressing viewpoints through strategies, managing risks effectively, experimenting with small capital instead of going 'all in,' and distinguishing market information to form independent judgments.
In the world of options, moving slower and steadier can lead to longer-lasting success. This journey is not short, but you are not walking it alone. "The Beginner’s Guide to Options Trading" will continue to be updated, accompanying you as you refine your mindset, enhance your understanding, and seize opportunities through practical experience.Click hereJoin the learning journey, and you will receive notifications when subsequent columns are updated. Specific content suggestions are also highly welcomed!
Lastly, here's a small bonus for everyone. If you plan to trade options soon, feel free to claim it.the Options Beginner Pack(*This event is exclusively for HK invited users; click to learn more.)Detailed rules of the event>>). If you still don't dare to trade, you canClick hereParticipate in the simulated trading challenge, with zero cost and zero risk, plus stock cash vouchers are waiting for you to claim!
